THE EFFECT OF DRTA STRATEGY AND STRATEGY ON THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 12, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): Ed 01

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ummul Mawaddah Rangkuti
Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya kemampuan siswa dalam memahami bacaan pada siswa SMP, karena pelaksanaan membaca intensif belum memenuhi hakikat membaca intensif itu sendiri. Penelitian ini, merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan rancangan pre-test-post-test control group design. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa pengujian keterampilan membaca intensif pada kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen pada pretest adalah t hitung < t tabel, 0,796 < 0,281, sehingga tidak terdapat perbedaan keterampilan membaca intensif pada kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen. kelas pada pre-test yang artinya tidak ada perbedaan kemampuan awal siswa sebelum diberikan tindakan.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Aruan, D. M. 2007. Penafsiran Skor Tes. Unpublished. Medan: State University of Medan.
  2. Ary, D. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. 8th edition. United State of America:Wardsworth.
  3. Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. "Styles and Strategies." Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Fourth edition. New York: Longman.
  4. Buss, Lauren M. 2005. Using Reading Response Journals for Reading Comprehension. Journal for Reading. Vol 8 (1) pp 1-7.
  5. __________. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman.
  6. Grabe, W & F Stoller. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow: Pearson ducation.
  7. Harmer, Jeremy. 2003. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rded). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  8. Mc. Neil J. D. 1992. Reading Comprehension. New Direction for Classroom Practice (3ed). Los Angeles: Harper Collons Publisher
  9. Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and learning. Boston: Heile and Heinle Publisher.
  10. Ogle, D.M. 1986. K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of text. Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
  11. Putri, Rini Fadillah. 2011. The Effect of Teaching Methods and Intrinsic Motivation on the Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. Thesis: English Applied Linguistics Study. Post Graduate Program. UNIMED.2011
  12. Richards, J.C & Theodore S.R. 2001. Approaches and Strategies in Language Teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press
  13. Riley. D. 2006. The Effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity on low reading Achievement First Grade Students. Dissertation International Abstracts.32 (4),259-262.
  14. Sigiro, A. 2010. The Effect of Reading Methods and Learning Styles on Reading Comprehension. Thesis: English Applied Linguistics Study. Post Graduate Program. UNIMED.2010
  15. Suherman. 2012. The Effect of Teaching Methods and Intrinsic Motivation on the Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. Thesis: English Applied Linguistics Study. Post Graduate Program. UNIMED.2012.